1. Secretary Kennedy dismisses all ACIP members
As noted in a previous edition of The Straight Shot, on June 9, Secretary Kennedy removed all 17 members of ACIP, claiming that this was a step to “restore trust.” On June 11, Sec. Kennedy announced the names of eight new members of the committee. These include Robert Malone, who spread falsehoods during Covid-19, and Vicky Pebsworth, who is a board member of one of the nation's most prominent anti-vaccine organizations. A third, Martin Kulldorf, was paid as recently as 2024 by the law firm Wisner Baum for work on their case against Merck alleging injuries from the HPV vaccine, Gardasil.
Career staff responsible for overseeing ACIP were also removed from their jobs. Dr. Melinda Wharton has been replaced by Mina Zadeh, who led the scheduling and advance team for the CDC director. Dr. Fiona Havers, the senior scientist who oversaw respiratory virus surveillance at the CDC, resigned, writing in an email to her colleagues: “Unfortunately, I no longer have confidence that these data will be used objectively or evaluated with appropriate scientific rigor to make evidence-based vaccine policy decisions."
Editor’s note: This new ACIP contains members whose only seeming qualification was their criticism of Covid vaccines. With a few exceptions, what the new panel lacks are scientists who have conducted clinical research on the safety and efficacy of vaccines, providers who counsel their patients about vaccination and administer vaccines as part of their routine practice, and public health officials who run immunization programs. Without the perspectives of those people who really understand vaccine science and the challenges of implementing recommendations, this new ACIP lacks the expertise to be credible. – SD
Secretary Kennedy continues to make erroneous statements about ACIP. For example, in a recent appearance on CBS News he once again stated that 97% of ACIP members have conflicts of interest. This is a favorite “fact” that he uses to defend his actions, but it is demonstrably incorrect. In fact, the report—which only looked at meetings held in 2007—found that 97% of the applications had at least one paperwork error, not at least one conflict of interest. Any journalist who interviews him should challenge him on this fact if he brings it up again. – JR
2. HHS drops recommendations for Covid vaccines for healthy children and pregnant people from its immunization schedule
HHS last week shared an FAQ document with congressional offices that attempts to justify removing the recommendation that healthy pregnant women and children receive the Covid vaccine. This document is riddled with inaccuracies; it cites unpublished and disputed studies and mischaracterizes and omits studies whose findings do not support the change in recommendations. Meanwhile, based on the available data, the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology strongly recommends Covid vaccination during pregnancy.
These new recommendations have already affected the availability of Covid vaccines. A pregnant woman in Seattle, WA told CNN she has been turned away from getting a Covid vaccine twice over the last weekend. Over 30 groups, including provider groups, issued an open letter calling on payors and insurers to continue to cover Covid vaccines.
Editor’s note: The changes to the Covid recommendations were not based in carefully considered science. But the practical implications of these changing recommendations are real, and they are going to cause actual harm to pregnant women and their children. – PL
3. HHS awards $150,000 to a law firm with a history of litigating claims alleging injuries from vaccines
There is limited publicly available information about this award to the firm Brueckner, Spitler, Shelts for “National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) expertise.” One of the lawyers at the firm, Andrew Dowing, has brought cases in the VICP seeking compensation for patients allegedly damaged by vaccines, and he is also involved in the lawsuit against Merck, alleging the company underplayed risks associated with its HPV vaccine.
Editor’s note: The Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is a critical component of the vaccination infrastructure, providing limited liability for vaccine manufacturers and administrators, and compensation for people who have been injured by vaccines. Any process to change the program should be transparent, open to public input, and not dominated by people or law firms with conflicts of interest. And it should not be happening behind closed doors. – SD